Why does Pariser suggest that experts are most vulnerable to confirmation bias? In what way does he suggest that reducing exposure to news and information (filtering) that doesn’t really interest you will limit your creativity? Can this filtering be useful? When might it be useful and when might it be harmful? Humans are social creatures. We are most comfortable when our ideas and beliefs are in consensus with those around us, even if that doesn’t always happen. [Consensus is a broad societal agreement on any given topic.] How would this filter bubble affect that consensus? If the filter bubble has blocked some information from your view, how will most people find it again? We’re not only asking what people should do, but also what they will do. Please see the link to read the chapter 3 . The password and username the same : sci350 For a custom paper on the above topic, place your order now! What We Offer: ¢ On-time delivery guarantee ¢ PhD-level writers ¢ Automatic plagiarism check ¢ 100% money-back guarantee ¢ 100% Privacy and Confidentiality ¢ High Quality custom-written papers