Peer review

Task description You are required to exchange your draft presentation with your partner. After reading the other person’s presentation you will write a review. Marks will be allocated in accordance with the criteria below. In your review you should use the following principles of effective feedback as headings: ¢ Commendations (praise) ¢ Affirmations (questions) ¢ Recommendations (polish) Your feedback should: ¢ briefly describe your colleague’s project ¢ demonstrate effective feedback principles ¢ be clearly linked to the requirements of assignment 1 part 3 criteria ¢ be structured in a way that enhances your colleague’s learning Word length Your review should be no more than 800 words. Please comply with this limit. ACHIEVEMENT CRITERIA 0-4 5-7 8-10 Project description You have not described your colleague’s project or you do not understand their work You have described your colleague’s project, but you lack some understanding of their work You have described your colleague’s project such that it shows that you understand the topic Effective feedback principles You have not used effective feedback principles You used some effective feedback principles You have used all of the effective feedback principles Meet the requirements of assignment 1 part 3 (see criteria for assignment) You have not made consideration towards the assignment requirements You have made some consideration towards the assignment requirements, but not all You have made adequate consideration to assignment requirements Enhance learning Your feedback does not promote improvement of your colleague’s work Your feedback allows your colleague to further develop their presentation Your feedback is very constructive and sets a clear path for presentation improvement. Place your order now for a similar paper and have exceptional work written by our team of experts to guarantee you A Results Why Choose US 6+ years experience on custom writing 80% Return Client Urgent 2 Hrs Delivery Your Privacy Guaranteed Unlimited Free Revisions